Mary Stewart Reading Notes: The Ivy Tree

In September I’ll be going back to some of Mary Stewart’s books, continuing with The Ivy Tree. Spoilers will be everywhere! Consider yourself warned.

the ivy treeThe Ivy Tree was published seven years into Mary Stewart’s career, in 1961, and in some ways it’s one of her strongest books. (Also one of my favorites.) It’s set in Northumberland, and weaves together some of the strands that Stewart returned to frequently. It’s an interesting one to reread, because the clues to the mystery are RIGHT THERE, I mean they are NOT HARD TO SPOT. And yet, the characters and their tangled relationships, and the vivid descriptions of the land and the farm are compelling enough that I didn’t even really mind. (Although I did notice.)

One of Stewart’s hallmarks is a well-read heroine, and she often opens with some sort of literary allusion. The Ivy Tree is no different–we start off with an old folk song for an epigraph and each chapter is headed with another bit of a folk song. There’s also a Shakespeare reference right on the first page.

But as I mentioned before, Stewart seems particularly fascinated by Jane Eyre and prone to include references in different ways. In Nine Coaches Waiting, it was the governess motif, but here it’s coming home to a burnt house (Thornfield/Forrest Hall) and an absent and scarred former lover. (Adam was even trying to save his wife, who had set a fire. I am not reading too much into this.)

She also includes hidden Roman ruins at least twice–here and in Touch Not the Cat. There seems to be a thread, at least in the English-set books, of the history of the landscape. The past is never that far from the present, whether it’s ancient, or more recent. In The Ivy Tree, family history is also important–it’s why Annabel left home, why Con makes the choices he does, and to a certain extent it’s why Annabel returns.

That’s the spoiler: Mary is totally Annabel. Now, it may be just because I read Brat Farrar again for last month’s series, but I kept wondering if Stewart was influenced by Tey at all. This story and Brat Farrar are kind of inverses of each other. Both main characters pretend to be someone they’re not. Brat pretends to be Patrick coming home; Annabel pretends that she is Mary Grey, but also that she is herself coming home. (This makes more sense in context.) I can’t say for sure, obviously, but regardless of Stewart’s intent, the echoes between the two are really interesting.

Now, to be fair, any mention of the Pennines is going to get me right away (thanks to both Code Name Verity and The Winter Prince). But also the opening of this book is just lovely: vivid descriptions of the landscape that somehow also give an instant sense of Mary/Annabel. There are other clues later in the book–her knowledge of Forrest Hall, of horse cant, of Adam–that give her away if you know what you’re looking for. I think, though, that the opening is where it starts. No stranger, however interested, could give such a detail and loving sense of the land.

And I do think that Stewart handles the emotional side of Annabel’s relationship to Whitescar and her family well. She’s playing a tricky game and we get to see just enough of it for the whole thing to work. I also liked the way Stewart uses Annabel’s cousin Julie as a foil, but also as someone that Annabel has an uncomplicated and warm relationship to. This can’t be said of any of the men in the picture, from Matthew right down to Con and Adam.

Stewart’s heroines have an unfortunate tendency to lose their backbone as soon as the romantic interest arrives. Annabel is really the least woolly of them all, in my opinion. She remains pretty self-reliant, although there are a few lapses into nonsense from time to time. And Adam, while not at all my cup of tea, is at least less annoying that Raoul. (Actually the man I like most in this one is Donald!) I did get a sense that there was a possibility of Adam and Annabel working through their past to a happy future together.

Still, for me the strengths of this one are much less the romance and much more Annabel’s common sense and strength. Combined with the texture of the family and landscape, it’s a story that I find quite compelling and enjoyable.

Book source: public library

Book information: 1961, adult romance/mystery

Advertisements

11 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

11 responses to “Mary Stewart Reading Notes: The Ivy Tree

  1. Donald Seton is my favorite male character in all of Stewart’s canon, and it all comes down to that scene where he’s surreptitiously feeding the cat under his armchair. He is such a lovely absent-minded, rumpled, shy intellectual with a secretly soft heart! Definitely one of the inspirations (even if it’s only just occurred to me now) for Sebastian Faraday in ULTRAVIOLET.

    Adam is OK in a tragic, haunted sort of way. Con can jump off a bridge, but we’re pretty much supposed to feel that way about him.

    • Maureen Eichner

      OH, yes, I really love Donald. And I can see that inspiration for Sebastian!

      I… don’t really care about Adam but at least I don’t say, “UGHHHH” every time he shows up.

  2. I just don’t remember this one at all. I wonder if I missed it? I need to wander over to my mother’s house and see if she has a copy.

  3. Isn’t Brat Farrar explicitly mentioned in this book? I think it’s clear it was an influence – at first I thought “copycat!” but then it became interesting to see what Stewart did differently with the same basic idea.

    • alinaccl

      Yes, Brat Farrar is mentioned in the text. The characters even use it as a how-to manual.

      • Maureen Eichner

        REALLY! How in the world did I miss that?? I’m starting to wonder if I read some weird American version. But yes, it is interesting to see how Stewart is playing with the same setup.

  4. This is possibly my favourite Stewart, so glad you covered it! I may have to do a re-read now.

    Li

  5. Mary Beth

    I liked this one right up until Adam came into the picture– I loathed him. (I kept yelling at Annabel, “Girl, you can do better!” Not sure if it’s the adultery angle that put me off him quite so hard, or just that I didn’t like him as a character; I adored Donald, like you, but I also found Con charming and entertaining right up until he went stupidly murderous. They’d have given you the farm if you asked for it, Con!

    I keep struggling with disbelief, though, over the idea that ANYONE could know another person well enough to coach an imposter into taking their place. Maybe 50 years ago people paid more attention to each others’ weird quirky details? Or I’m just spectacularly in observant… (At least Annabel DOES have good reason for succeeding at her lessons so well, unlike Brat!)

    • Maureen Eichner

      Lollll, that is 100% me with Raoul. Con…I feel sorry for in a certain way, but also like he chose his own fate in another way. I can see why others found him charming, though.

      I suspect that there’s partly a weird assumption of heritage/”blood will out”–like, yes, Alex & Con coach Brat & “Mary”, but they wouldn’t be able to succeed if they weren’t actually related somehow. (But of course Annabel can successfully pretend to be herself–this book is so convoluted.)

  6. Pingback: September round up & October releases | By Singing Light

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s