bookish posts reading notes reviews

Mary Stewart Reading Notes: Nine Coaches Waiting

nine coachesIn September I’ll be going back to some of Mary Stewart’s books, beginning with Nine Coaches Waiting. Spoilers will be everywhere! Also I do some yelling in this post. Consider yourself warned.

Nine Coaches Waiting is Stewart’s fourth book, published in 1958 and which is set contemporary to its publication date. I’ve read it a couple of times already and have always had mixed feelings about parts of the plot and characterization. SURPRISE, I still feel that way! I also want to say right away that there is a disabled character in this book and the representation is TERRIBLE (evil, manipulative, villain of the whole thing). I do not recommend it on that score at all.

One of the things I like to do in these Reading Notes series is trace out images or themes the author keeps returning to. With Stewart, there are a couple that I noticed which are certain present in Nine Coaches Waiting. First, she tends to weave in allusions to literature throughout her books–her heroines are usually educated in the classics, and Stewart also includes epigraphs and framings. In this case, each chapter is headed with a quote from an earlier book, whether it’s Dickens or The Revenger’s Tragedy. They all have some connection to the following chapter, and generally from books with some sort of mystery/revenge/suspense element.

Because Stewart is very consciously in conversation with the Gothic tradition, we see her playing with the themes of the possibly dangerous charmer/seducer. Leon and Raoul both fall into this pattern, with Leon coming down on the side of dangerous and Raoul on the side of charmer (sort of, more on that later). There’s also the grand but crumbling house, the ominous servants, and etc. But Stewart is also consciously and deliberately referencing Jane Eyre, which she does in some form or another in almost every book she wrote. We see it in Linda’s position as a governess, in her initial meeting with Raoul which echoes Jane’s meeting with Rochester down to the fog and the almost-accident, in her care for her young charge when no one else seems to care for them.

However much I do like Nine Coaches, I can’t say it exactly measures up to Jane Eyre.

I do like Linda, however. I think she’s one of Stewart’s more successful narrators, which is a little different than saying she’s one of Stewart’s more successful main characters. Her voice is clear and sharp from the first page, and I found myself interested in the way she both keeps secrets and tries to uncover them. Right from the beginning we see that she dislikes being manipulated, that she’s impetuous, fond of beautiful and romantic things. She’s has a moral backbone which drives a lot of the book, and I appreciated seeing that without her being goody-goody.

However, there’s generally a tension in Stewart’s books between the strength of the heroines and the inevitable romantic entanglement, and it’s here that I found myself frustrated with Linda and with the book generally. Both Raoul and Leon have a kind of wobbling effect on her, which is part of the danger that both promise but which is never entirely dealt with.

In fact, let me say here and now that this is a good old case of some great gaslighting! Leon tells Linda that she’s being “a little hysterical” (My note at this point, verbatim: “DAGGERS, LEON”) and generally tries to convince her that everything she’s worried about is in her head. When Raoul kisses Linda and she doesn’t react positively he writes “It was only a kiss after all” (SHUT UP, RAOUL!). And we’re supposed to believe that Linda is going to live happily ever after with him.

This kind of comes to a head for me when Linda believes that Raoul is part of the plot to kill Philippe. Eventually she discovers that this is not the case, thanks to some handwavey explanations from Stewart. Raoul was completely innocent and is hurt that she suspected him. And it doesn’t bother me that he was innocent the whole time, or even that Linda’s suspicious were wrong. It does bother me that she then apologizes. She had what she believed was good evidence for his involvement and she APOLOGIZES FOR EVER BELIEVING IT.


So, yeah, the romance angle is by far the weakest part of the book for me. I MEAN, WHY. However, I do genuinely enjoy the mystery aspect and Stewart’s prose is lovely. She has a gift for descriptions that shows up in all of her books, and here she combines it with a sense of atmosphere and doom that is really effective. I just wish that Linda’s story didn’t end in a marriage that seems destined for misery.

Book source: public library
Book information: 1958, adult romance/mystery

Looking for my other Mary Stewart posts?


The Ivy Tree

Stormy Petrel


By Maureen LaFerney

My name is Maureen. I currently work as a library assistant in a public library in the Indianapolis area, and also just so happen to be a voracious reader. I frequently end up under a cat.

8 replies on “Mary Stewart Reading Notes: Nine Coaches Waiting”

Raoul is my least favorite of all Stewart’s romantic leads, I think. Some of the others have an annoying tendency to be overbearing as well, but Raoul’s macho posturing is of a very specific and sustained kind that is not excused by any amount of references to how handsome he is. (Especially as he’s not my type. I’m more attracted to Leon than Raoul).

It also exasperates me that when Linda asks him why he would be interested in her (since she has a low self-esteem to rival Bella Swan’s), Raoul turns her toward the mirror and says, “That’s why.” Uh, yay for Linda being beautiful at this point in her life? This does not exactly fill me with confidence about the long-term viability of your relationship.

“Raoul’s macho posturing is of a very specific and sustained kind” Yes. I don’t love overbearing heroes in general, but Raoul’s sort is especially toxic.

“This does not exactly fill me with confidence about the long-term viability of your relationship.” EXACTLY.

I actually like the romance in Nine Coaches Waiting. But your post has reminded me that I find it hard to look at the book with any sort of critical distance because of the impression it made on me when I first read it. (It was like someone had taken my love of Jane Eyre and mashed it together my more-recent discoveries of Agatha Christie and fairytale retellings and said “Here you go, this is what you’ve been looking for!”)

So while I’m more aware of problematic aspects of Raoul’s behaviour than I was then, I’ve retained my teenage-self’s conviction that Linda is level-headed and resourceful enough to deal with any issues in the future. More or less how I feel about Jane and Rochester, come to think of it.

That’s really interesting to me, largely because I do believe in Jane and Rochester, but not Linda and Raoul, and I’m not sure why! I’ll have to think about that some more.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.