Too Like the Lightning by Ada Palmer

too like the lightningToo Like the Lightning is Ada Palmer’s fiction debut, and it is part one of at least a two part series. (I wasn’t warned about this, and I kind of wish I had been. My expectations are different when reading a story that won’t be finished for another book.) And, I liked this book. I think. Mostly. It’s very peculiar and difficult to explain, which makes it sound awful. It’s not awful, but it is a kind of book that I found it hard to grapple with.

Too Like the Lightning is set in the future, in a sort-of utopia, which has achieved its status by a careful balance of alliances and interests. This occurs less across national and international divides and more through clusters of philosophical outlook and tradition which people subscribe to. These are called Hives, and are the main political and personal forces. Public displays of religion have basically been outlawed.

So, this is science fiction, but it’s the kind of science fiction that talks about Thomas Carlyle and Voltaire all the time. The Enlightenment is as powerful a force in this society as any other point in history–we are given a sense of the great philosophers and thinkers of the fictional near past, but they also hearken back to the 18th century. And there’s the kind of science that basically looks like magic, also possibly real magic in the form of a mysterious child named Bridger. This is what I mean by peculiar.

It is mostly narrated by a man named Mycroft Canner–everyone in this book has that sort of name–and he is not entirely reliable. This fact is hammered home a little too forcefully towards the end of the book, but it’s fairly clear from early on*. Mycroft is a Servicer, sentenced to a lifetime of usefully helping society after having committed a serious crime. Mycroft, we’re given to understand, is an extra-specially notorious criminal whose identity has to be obfuscated for his own protection.

We do also have occasional interjections from other characters and points of view, although how many of these are in fact filtered through Mycroft is an open question. But this book is full of other people, because Mycroft has his fingers in all of the pies and knows all the powerful people in this world. This is a book about power and who wields it and how it is balanced and unbalanced. Most of these characters are sketched in quickly, but some of them are given more depth. The sheer number of names and the relationships between them can be pretty overwhelming at times.

And that, I think points to my main lingering puzzlement about this book. It’s almost 400 pages long and I read them all. I feel that I should be able to say if it’s interested in plot (things definitely happen!) or characters (there are lots, and they’re interesting!) or philosophy (there’s so much of it. SO MUCH.) but in the end it all seems somehow very detached. My point earlier about it being interested in power and the shifting and balancing of power is as close as I can come to any kind of a theory of what this book is about, and why you might be interested in it. (Unless you are the kind of person who automatically perks up at the mention of Enlightenment philosophy, in which case this is the book for you.)

I have other lingering puzzlements, however. First: how do I feel about Mycroft at the end of the book? I don’t know. Palmer is playing with the reader’s expectation of trust and I’m not entirely sure if it’s not working, or if it’s working perfectly and I just don’t like it. Second: how do I feel about everyone else? WHO KNOWS? They are all kind of awful in a fascinating way, even–I would argue–Bridger. The narrative really seems to want us to care about Bridger, who is the force of innocence and goodness, but who ends up coming across as Charles Wallace Murry x 10.

Also, two related further puzzlements. Why does everyone seem so pro-Mycroft? Is it simply that we’re getting the story filtered through his perspective? I ended up wondering if I would like the story better if it were about Thisbe. Further: the social understanding of gender in this world confounds our gender expectations, which would be really interesting. Except that Mycroft’s narration, which often puts gender back onto the characters, seems to reinforce them, and I’m not sure how I feel about that. It seems less successful than, say, Leckie’s use of “she” as the default pronoun in the Imperial Radch books.

Finally, this is less of a puzzlement and more of an outright nope–I got very frustrated with a section about icons that does not understand icons or their religious significance and use. I shouldn’t be surprised about this, because it happens all the time, but I found it annoying, and it made me wonder what else the book got wrong.

Sometimes when I’m not sure how I feel about a book, writing the review helps me solidify that. In this case, I still don’t know! It’s a mostly-positive befuddlement. And I’m not exactly sure who I would recommend this book to, either. You don’t need to have an in-depth knowledge of philosophy to be able to read it, but you do have to be patient enough to work through all the names and social conventions and mini-history lessons. Ultimately, for that patient reader, it is a rewarding book, even though I still can’t say exactly why I liked it.

* Yes, yes, arguably all first person narrators are unreliable to a certain degree. Mycroft is a bit beyond that.

Book source: public library

Book information: 2016, Tor Books; adult science fiction

Other reviews: Jason Heller at NPR; Liz Bourke; Crooked Timber; yours?

Advertisements

9 Comments

Filed under bookish posts, reviews

9 responses to “Too Like the Lightning by Ada Palmer

  1. Man, I am NOT sure whether to want to read this book or not. One of my blogging friends (Ana possibly?) recommended it when the first chapter showed up on Tor.com, and I wasn’t fully sure whether I could handle a whole entire book in that writing style. I am like specifically DISinterested in Enlightenment philosophy. Also: most philosophy ever.

    • Maureen Eichner

      I am really not sure whether to recommend it or not. Probably not if you’re not into philosophy? I at least have that going for me even if I’m still a bit befuddled by the book as a whole. But I mean, I did like it overall as a reading experience.

  2. Pingback: July 2016 round up | By Singing Light

  3. I wrote about this book quite a bit on Tumblr when I first read it. Usually I tend to be a pretty solitary reader but this was one of those books I HAD to talk about because I wasn’t sure what to think. Its certainly a book of ideas and I don’t think all of them work–the treatment of gender is one obvious failure–but they’re still sparks to talk about and perhaps that’s its success. I don’t know that I would recommend the book to many people, and not just because of Mycroft. But I want to TALK about it with whoever’s already read it!

    • Maureen Eichner

      Oh, you’ve read it!! I missed that somehow (well, I kind of ignored Tumblr by accident for a bit there) and just read through your tag.

      “they’re still sparks to talk about and perhaps that’s its success” Yes! I have a lot of thoughts about what it’s trying to do and where it maybe fails, which in a certain sense is more interesting than a book I either loved or hated.

      I might message you on Tumblr because everything else I want to say gets spoilery fast, but I’m also going out of town tomorrow, so it might be a few days!

      • It’s odd, but for books that I really loved I don’t always get the impulse to talk about them; sometimes I need to just treasure them privately, or at the most push them into a friend. I’m trying to do better (following your example) with Read and Reading posts–since I pick up so many of my favorite books from other people’s reviews!

        I didn’t love this book, even when I admired what it was doing–and I didn’t hate it, even when it betrayed me (and had warned me it was going to!) My emotions weren’t engaged enough with the story and the characters for either of these. But my intellect sure was!

        Definitely message me when you get back! And have a great time out there. 🙂

  4. Pingback: August 2016 round up | By Singing Light

  5. Pingback: 2016: favorite posts | By Singing Light

  6. Pingback: Glimpse of Augusts past | By Singing Light

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s