The Winner’s Curse by Marie Rutkoski

winner's curseWhen I first heard about this book, I was pretty excited, since I’ve consistently enjoyed Marie Rutkoski’s work (and LOVED her first trilogy). My enthusiasm suffered a slight ding when I read The Book Smuggler’s review, but I still looked forward to reading it a lot.

So, what to say, after actually reading? The writing is wonderful, which is not surprising. Rutkoski is a skilled prose writer, one of those people who can make it look so effortless. The world and characters are engaging and the pace really sweeps along, making for a breathless read, especially in the second half.

I very much liked and appreciated the fact that Kestrel is a heroine with a lot of agency and strength who is not great at fighting. Her talents lie in strategy and planning. Since I am always going on about the need for all kinds of heroines, this was a very nice thing to see.

I’ll also note that while I didn’t love the cover at first glance, and even really now, since it puts Kestrel in a weirdly passive pose, it does include a number of nice little details from the book–her braided hair, the dagger, etc.

Going in, I was worried about the romance between Kestrel and Arin, the slave she buys. It sounds fairly dicey in the abstract. That aspect actually turned out to be really well done, in my opinion. There’s a sense of meeting of the minds, rather than the purely physical “He’s so cutttteee” attraction which I personally feel is the downfall of many paranormal romances. They’re both complicated enough characters that their relationship is not a smooth one, but it’s also written in a way that I bought and became invested in.

So, all of those are positives, but I was left with some niggling issues and a whole post-it of notes. These are mostly related to the implications of the wider political scope of the book. Now, I’ll note that this is the first in a trilogy and I may later eat my words. However, I’m not entirely convinced that this will happen.

I’ll note now that the rest of this review will probably be mildly spoilery–if you want to avoid any and all spoilers, this is the place to stop reading.

Overall, I was left with a sense that, although lots of things happen–lots of huge changes in the characters’ lives and in their world which have huge implications for the way things will go in the future–the decisions and the consequences of those decisions are too easy. This is revolution, but it is a carefully planned revolution in which there is no chaos, no rioting, no uncontrolled bloodshed.

Similarly, because Kestrel’s strength is strategy, many of her decisions are made on the level of intellect rather than emotion. Although I certainly like seeing this as a strength, I also felt that it gave her actions a deliberate, bounded quality. Certainly there are consequences she doesn’t see or intend–the resolution of the book proves that–and yet, even in the twists, I felt that things were planned.

I also felt pretty strongly that Arin and Kestrel are both too Special. This is more of an issue in Arin’s case than in Kestrel’s, who is at least the child of one of the most rich and important men in the empire. Her skills make sense given her upbringing, special tutors, and so on. In Arin’s case, he’s about ten when the Herrani are subsumed into the Empire. He is then a slave, working in a quarry, in the docks, as a blacksmith. His being able to read makes sense; his knowing enough to successfully plan a revolution doesn’t work so well.

Underlying all of this is a key objection I have: that for a book dealing with the breaking down of privilege and a revolution against an oppressive government, the status quo remains oddly unchanged. We never really see the effects of slavery on the Herrani; there is no sense of the everyday violence they suffer, except the beating that Arin suffers at the hands of the Trajan family guards. The violence that we actually see as readers starts with the revolution.

I kept comparing this portrayal of Greco-Roman style slavery with that in A Conspiracy of Kings, which also deal with a child of privilege being confronted with the reality of slavery, but which has–at least for me–a much different effect. Sophos, in that instance, is himself directly affected and changed because of his experiences; his assumptions about the way the world works are completely broken down. While The Winner’s Curse makes many of the same moves, Kestrel has to be almost impossibly sympathetic, even at the beginning.

And although Arin is a point-of-view character, he is far more static than Kestrel. Kestrel, whose changing understanding allegiances are at the heart of the story. It’s her journey that is important, a kind of privileging of privilege. And Arin is, of course, a child of privilege himself, despite his current position. He is the natural leader of the Herrani resistance, because he is naturally charming and well spoken and strategically gifted–in a word, he is well born, with all that phrase implies. His conflict as a character comes with his growing attraction to Kestrel and the tension between that and his duty to his people, which is all good and interesting as it goes (I do like when main characters want to do the right thing), but it’s never resolved and I never had a sense that he had grown as a character.

All of this probably sounds more negative than I really mean it to. They’re certainly questions and concerns I have, but at the same time, I would say that I did enjoy The Winner’s Curse and intend to read the rest of the books. I’ll be interested to see if my perception changes once the series is complete. And I’ll add the caveat that other readers may not notice, or may not care about, or may disagree with my reading of the implications of the political aspects of the book. That’s all perfectly valid.

Other reviews of The Winner’s Curse:
Shae
The Book Smugglers
Stacked Books

Advertisements

15 Comments

Filed under bookish posts, reviews

15 responses to “The Winner’s Curse by Marie Rutkoski

  1. I have to say, I hate that cover. It’s not the pose . . . except that I don’t much care for girls in prom dresses, or girls that look like they might be dead, so there’s that . . . but who picked that font and design for the title and the author’s name? Both unattractive and hard to read, imo.

    I don’t know, I think now that you’ve pointed it out, the Specialness thing would bother me quite a bit. But I understand that comments sometime sound more negative than the reading experience actually was. If you were rating this out of ten, where would it fall for you?

    • Maureen Eichner

      I know. And I don’t think it fits Kestrel very well at all, though they’ve clearly picked up a number of details from the book. Not the author’s fault, obviously, but it is annoying.

      As far as a rating goes, 6? 7? I don’t normally rate out of ten, which makes it a bit more difficult to gauge.

  2. Oh, this sounds a lot better than I thought from my first impression. I think I will have to read it after all. 🙂 I think my major problem with the chapters I sampled was that Kestrel’s attraction to Arin seemed entirely physical (i.e., she’s a teenage girl who wants a hot slave), with some mumbo-jumbo about his special aura thrown in to excuse it. Sounds like the characters do get a bit more complex.

  3. I’m another one of those people who isn’t completely in love with this book, for many of the same reasons that you had some issues. Mainly, the convenience of it all really bothered me. And the extra-speciallness of Kestrel and Arin. It just felt like it should have been more complicated/complex than it actually was. But I remain hopeful that the series will get better as it continues.

  4. I am not sure I’ll be able to finish it–I just cannot accept how easy it seems to have been for Kestral’s people to come charging in and enslave everybody. Mass enslavement of all inhabitants of a conquered country should be harder!

  5. I found myself hating Kestrel and thinking that she was a spoiled brat. Without being spoilery, I thought that toward the end she spent a lot of time complaining while nothing bad really happened to her. If war is to be believable, sometimes protagonists need to suffer at least some realistic consequence of it.

    • Maureen Eichner

      Hmm, I certainly didn’t hate her, and I didn’t see her as a spoiled brat. I do think she has lead an incredibly sheltered life and is very naive about things–almost unbelievably so. But I do definitely agree that the consequences weren’t nearly as heightened as they perhaps should have been, for the story to really work.

      • I really wanted to like her too, but she just didn’t work for me. She reminds me of a Scarlet O’Hara figure. The fact that she’s sheltered in the midst of so much suffering and then gets so disgruntled about being taken prisoner in an obvious ploy to save her life irritated me. And it’s not that I wish her real harm, it’s that the fact that nothing happens to her makes it hard to believe the seriousness of her situation. That’s not to say that I won’t read the sequel when it comes out though. Very curious about the way this one ended and how that’ll work out for everyone. 🙂

        • Maureen Eichner

          Yeah, I definitely get what you’re saying, although I think I was seeing it as an issue in the book as a whole as opposed to Kestrel specifically. And I’m also curious about how this one will work out!

  6. Pingback: 2014: Non-fiction, blog series, and more | By Singing Light

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s